![]() ![]() The test is not available online, as it’s a copyrighted property of the University of Minnesota, and a certain fee must be paid in order to use the test. The MMPI testing tools are considered to be a protected psychological instrument, meaning it can only be given and interpreted by a trained psychologist. Also, it offers larger research base.Īdditionally, there is also another version of the test, which has been designed exclusively for teenagers. This test only comprises of 338 true/false questions, and it takes half the time to complete it, which is 30 – 50 minutes to 60 – 90 of MMPI-2.īecause of MMPI-2’s familiarity with the psychologists, it’s still the most widely used test. The other form is the MMPI-2-RF, a newer version established in 2008. MMPI-2 is the traditional version which comprises of 567 true/false questions. This testing tool is administered in one of two forms at present. MMPI-2 has also been practiced in analyzing the effectiveness of treatment programs like substance abuse programs. This testing tool has also been used as a measuring instrument for various professions, especially in case of high risk jobs. Other than the clinical environment, the test is also found to be used in legal cases, custody disputes, criminal defense, and so on. Even though this tool was not designed for non-clinical uses originally, it has been found to be more commonly used in both clinical and nonclinical environments. MMPI assessment personality psychometrics psychopathology.The test was initially designed to test people for their mental health issues, as well as assess their personality traits and psychopathology. ![]() Overall, we determined that scale scores derived from either booklet are psychometrically interchangeable, indicating that MMPI-3 scale scores obtained from an administration of the MMPI-2-RF-EX can be applied when using the 335-item MMPI-3. Finally, we computed column-vector correlations between MMPI-3 scores from both versions and several criterion measures, where results reflected no effect of test version on external validity. We also compared between-version test-retest comparability values with within-version values calculated using a sample of undergraduates ( N = 318) who completed the MMPI-2-RF-EX twice over the same time interval, finding only marginal differences across the two samples. Across versions, mean T-scores and standard deviations, estimates of internal consistency, and standard error of measurement values, were highly similar, indicating no clinically meaningful differences across versions. To that end, we examined data from 192 college undergraduates who completed both the MMPI-3 and MMPI-2-RF-EX 1 week apart using a counterbalanced design. The current study evaluated the comparability of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) scale scores derived from the 335-item MMPI-3 to MMPI-3 scale scores derived from the 433-item MMPI-2 restructured form-expanded version (MMPI-2-RF-EX), an enhanced version of the MMPI-2-RF that was used to develop and validate the MMPI-3. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |